I believe that the appropriate point to start a discussion like this is the manner in which the formal leader of an organization refers to him/herself when speaking about the organization. Use of the personal "I" will not support an empowered work force and enlist them in pursuit of goals. Rather, when the formal leader employs the use of "we" or "our" in explaining the operation and aspirations of the organization.
Empowerment takes on heightened importance because it can increase commitment and outputs when people feel aligned with a greater purpose guiding an environment oriented to growing people as well as growing the success of the organization.
Money alone is not the incentive for people to invest fully in their work. It has been shown to not be a motivator, but rather a satisfier. The long term interests and needs of an organization rest on a compelling and credible vision, a meaningful mission, and most importantly a perception by the individual that they matter and make a difference within an organization that values and nurtures the opportunity to grow as a person.
Consider the advice of Bill O'Brien, a successful CEO who is quoted in Peter Senge's book, The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook:
“Our
traditional organizations are designed to provide for the first three levels of
Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of human needs – food, shelter, and belonging. Since
these are widely available to members of an industrial society, these
organizations do not provide anything particularly unique to command the
loyalty and commitment of people. The ferment in management today will continue
until organizations begin to address the higher order needs: self-respect and self-actualization."
No comments:
Post a Comment