Valid email addresses are required to post comments. If your comment is not posted, I will send you an email with an explanation.

Saturday, May 19, 2018

Investment in Human Infrastructure???

The title of this Blog evolved from an article I found on the internet (see link below) that identified the thirteen college majors in which pay goes nowhere. It is both interesting and ironic that a large number of these majors (human services, social work, child development, special education, elementary education, pastoral ministry) are involved with training people in helping others. The list begs the question of how well our society is investing in the human infrastructure necessary to provide help in developing others and assistance in meeting the needs of others. Are we unconsciously promoting an “every man for himself” and “survival of the fittest” perspective that discounts collaboration and cooperation for the common good?

 Here’s the link and the list:

1. Child Development
2. Human Services
3. Early Childhood and Elementary Education
4. Clinical Laboratory Science
5. Pastoral Ministry
6. Athletic Training
7. Medical Technology
8. Recreation and Leisure Studies
9. Special Education
10. Horticulture
11. Nutrition
12. Social Work
13. Theology      

The Who and The What of Interviews

Our school recently engaged in a search and selection process to fill teaching vacancies for the upcoming school year. We began the task by creating a group of interested, representative  stakeholders who then identified the attitude, skills, and experiences desired in someone joining our school community. That in itself is a deviation from the path often taken by schools seeking to fill openings. Too many interview committees (assuming that the committee isn't comprised solely of administrators) simply dig into the pile of applicants without a consensus on what they are looking for. As the Cheshire Cat advises Alice in Wonderland when she is lost, "If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there." In such instances, committee members could be distracted in their quest by candidates who were in the same sorority/fraternity, attended the same college, or other intangible points of interest/coincidence, and travel off in a direction away from hiring the right teacher.

Once we reach agreement on what our organizational culture needs, and reflect on what our learners deserve, we used the list of attributes as a map to guide us through the pile of applications. The most important, and revealing, element of the application materials is the cover letter. Resumes all follow a couple of different templates that generally standardize the document and confine information to the "what" of the candidate - college degrees, major area of studies, grade point average, certifications, experience, references... The cover letter, on the other hand, if properly constructed (i.e. not simply a narrative of the resume, which is redundant) can provide interviewers with insight into how the applicant can distinguish him/herself from others. The well-crafted cover letter can explain "who" the applicant is and how they stand out. And, since we value who the person is more than what the person is, as every human service agency should, we are closer to finding the right person to add to our school community. Southwest Airlines claims that they, "Hire for attitude, and train for altitude." If we hire the right person, who "fits" our school culture, we are capable of training them in any area of unfamiliarity or deficiency.

The cover letter offers the applicant an opportunity to market him/herself by supplying how they can add value to the school community, why they are interested in this particular opportunity (we avoid hiring people looking for a job) and how they can maintain their balance while investing in the challenging role of meeting the needs of, and making a difference in, impoverished learners. It is important to note that we are not searching for people who mirror our existing staff, in some cookie cutter fashion. Instead, we want to find someone who can ensure that while we are aligned in our purpose, we are cognizant of the value of diversity in perspective, experience, and practice. 

We begin our interviews with a simple question.

What would you like to tell us about yourself beyond the content of your resume and outside the walls of a classroom? 

That solicitation is followed by:

What is your favorite book or movie?
If you could pick any character from any book or movie you've experienced, who would you like to be, and why?
Can you tell us about your hero/heroes?
If the person who knows you best was writing a book about your life, what would it be entitled, other than your name?
Think of the one best teacher you have ever interacted with - from Kindergarten on - and, without identifying the individual, explain why that person stands out from all the rest.
Recall a struggle or challenge you have faced, and without telling us what it was, describe the manner in which you overcame the obstacle.
What is more important - what you teach, how you teach, or who you teach? (explain your answer)
How do you maintain a balance in your work and life outside of school?

There are other questions intended to find out the values, aspirations, and uniqueness of the candidates. Finally, there are a few questions about classroom management, literacy instruction... that supply us with some of the conventional aspects of teaching. 

The ultimate decision on who we advance in the process to meet with the superintendent emerges out of a discussion among committee members on the fit between the potential of the candidate and the needs of our school/learners.

References are checked with respect to the degree of alignment between what the reference says and how the candidate defined him/herself.

I have been an active participant in hiring over one hundred teachers in my forty-two year leadership career as either a principal and superintendent. I cannot recall the grade point average or college or certification status of any of the people who were hired. But, I can fondly remember how they made children feel and what differences they made in the lives of others.

Wednesday, April 18, 2018

Tests and Tears

The approach of the state-wide assessments, an unfortunate rite of spring, has brought with it a great deal of unwanted and unnecessary anxiety among staff members and children. Tests that produce tears, stomach aches, or sleepless nights should be questioned.
I have served as an educational leader for forty years. On that basis, I can assert my opinion that tests do not define children. In fact, while tests are used in many different ways, and often determine the path one takes through their schooling, they may not be predictors of success as adults. Maybe the outcome of tests enable some people to experience advantages in the future, such as college entrance or admission to advanced programs, but that is not enough to ensure success. More likely, the assessment of adults in workplaces is viewed through the perception of an individual's ability to communicate, cooperate with others, exhibit dependability, adapt to new situations, display responsibility, and a host of other attitudes and attributes commonly referred to as "soft skills."
Our school will be measured by the state agency of education in large part on the results of tests like the SBAC. Although I do not ignore the data obtained through these tests and others, and we strive to meet our collective potential, I maintain that we cannot allow the facts and figures of these test results to obscure the faces and feelings of the children taking the tests. The mission of our school does not mention anything related to test results. Rather, our mission is: "Provide opportunities for learners of all ages, at all stages, to reach their potential."
Think back to your own favorite teacher... Do you know: What college they attended? What their grade point average was? Whether they had a graduate degree? How they scored on teacher tests required for certification? Probably not. But, I bet you can remember how they made you feel. I'm sure your favorite teacher stood out because of their ability to bring a smile to your face on days when it was hard to smile, their acceptance of you as an individual, their acknowledgement of a new hair style or a lost tooth, the time they took to listen to you, and many other experiences not measured by any timed test.
I believe that the measure of a person is not what can be seen, but what can be felt - and that is what's inside of a person - their level of care, empathy, compassion, tolerance, willingness and ability to listen to opposing views and ideas, determination, acceptance of learning as a life-long experience, commitment to their beliefs, and many other characteristics that define who we are.
I will end this post (which helps define who I am) and step off the soapbox by sharing the following quote attributed to Sir George Pickering (and others):
"Not everything that counts can be counted. Not everything that can be counted, counts."
Think about that as we each face our own tests, be they with paper and pencil in class or challenges at work or at home. What really counts?

Saturday, January 6, 2018

Thoughts on a Snow Day


There is no school tomorrow, Friday, January 5th due to lousy, terrible, ridiculous weather...

Stay warm and inside if you can. Try to enjoy your weekend. 

Kids, the cold weather should keep you inside. There's a lot to do inside, like - 

Play games without batteries or electrical cords, 
Read some more, 
Talk with family members, 
Think about your future, 
Call your grandparents and ask them what they did on snow days without cable TV, cell phones, the internet, or video games, (yes, there was life before all of that)
Draw something and then write about it
Did I already encourage you to read? 
Well, read even more. 
I'll see you Monday, and you can tell me about what you read.

Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Pushing Beyond the 20% Barrier

Molly Stark Elementary School has fallen short of its collective potential. We are an under-performing school. Test scores bear this point out.

How can we catch up to where we could be, where we need to be, given the restrictions of time and resources? The school year is similar to every other school throughout the state and country - 6.5 hours for each of 180 days in a school year. Our budget is not likely to rise appreciably within the constraints of the local economy.

Furthermore, when you assume that children sleep for 8 hours a day, out of a calendar year of 365 days (365 x 16 = 5,840 hours) and recognize their time in school (6.5 hours x 180 days = 1,170 hours) you find that children are only in school for 20% (1,170/5,840) of their waking hours. This limits our ability to effect a positive and constructive impact on their pursuit of potential.

Our school has developed and initiated significant changes in our infrastructure (master schedule and space allocations) and staff development (curricular focused PD, issue oriented faculty meetings). Beyond these two vital areas, we have sought to extend our reach and expand our influence without tapping our budget or stretching our work day.

Yesterday capped a lengthy process involving three different entities addressing a perceived need - providing access to books to our learners outside of the school hours. Our school, which provides free and reduced meals to 81% of the children, is located across the street from a public housing project that is home to 13% of our learner population. 

We approached the management of the housing project with the idea of building shelves full of books in their community center in the form of a free lending library. They welcomed the possibility.

Our staff began collecting gently used books. We reached out to the Southern Vermont Career and Development Center and asked if their Buildings and Trades department would be willing to accept the task of constructing bookshelves. They readily accepted after an anonymous benefactor of the school supplied the funds for materials.

All of the participating groups were brought together yesterday morning and started stocking the shelves of the lending library. It was exciting to see the crew of carpenters (headed by their teacher - who grew up in the housing project), together with the superintendent of the CDC,  partner with five of our elementary school learners and the reading teacher who spearheaded the collection of books, and join with the director of the housing project to fill the shelves.

We hope to fill the minds of our learners by increasing their access to literature outside of the school day.

Sunday, November 5, 2017

Reflecting on Reflection

I retired as a superintendent in New York two years ago. My wife and I moved to another part of the state, along the border with Vermont, after the birth of our only grandchild. Soon thereafter, I accepted the opportunity to resume my school leadership career as a principal in Vermont, just across the border. This enabled me to collect my pension in New York and my salary in Vermont.

I enjoy the return to leadership at the building level, but composing blog entries has been a struggle recently. This dormant period happens to coincide with my acceptance of a the principal's position a year and a half ago. 

The educational alchemist blog originated when I assumed the role of a school superintendent in 2010. I began to pen entries in earnest, offering perspectives on rising issues or simple reflections on daily activities. Entries during that fertile writing period averaged at east four posts a week. There was ample time to indulge in thought. The words surged forth and my fingers danced along keyboard. I enjoyed the exercise of expressing thoughts because it prompted me to examine what I experienced and reconstruct it in words. That introspection nurtured growth.

This weekend was the first time in weeks and weeks that I found, or made, the time to write. Whenever I questioned myself about the absence of posts I mustered several possible reasons, ranging from indifference, laziness, to a general lack of opportunity. I arrived at what I imagine to be the culprit. It was hidden within me, perhaps because I didn't want to confront the matter, perhaps it was due to an apparent simplicity of explanation that might render the reason too easy for the reader to dismiss, particularly if they are a school superintendent. 

That's the point of this blog entry. The daily role of the superintendent usually affords the district leader more time to reflect. While the schedule is cluttered with meetings, many of them (i.e. policy development, strategic planning, budget forecasting...) are focused on a linger view into the future and that proverbial "big picture."  

I never felt that assuming the role of a superintendent endowed me with greater knowledge or insight than I possessed as a principal. Instead, I explained the difference as a matter of a hierarchy of perspectives. That is, when I was a teacher, my view was limited, like someone sitting in a room with a lone window that narrowed the view outside to that single frame. When I became a principal, I found that I now had windows on two sides of the four walls. Therefore, I was able to see things that elude someone restricted to one window. When I became a superintendent, I discovered windows on all four walls. I wasn't any smarter, I just had views (i.e. on personnel, negotiations, budgets...) that was unavailable to most others.

We tend to limit ourselves because the realities of our day obscure our vision and opportunity to reflect. The constant assault of people, needs, conflict... whether it's a teacher contending with 25 learners all day or a principal addressing issues that pop up unexpectedly, like discipline, prevents one from pausing to reflect on our actions and words. There is an expression I learned in Texas that explains the situation - "When you're up to your ass in alligators, it's hard to remember your job was to drain the pool." 

This is not to say that a superintendent is immune from the unanticipated issue or surprising development (and I fully understand from experience that the extent and reach of such problems are deeper and farther), but they usually have more control over their time. Their todays do not necessarily hold their tomorrows hostage. 

As a principal, my day too often seems like one long game of "whack-a-mole," the carnival game where something pops up and you task is to use a mallet to hit it back down - except that as soon as one pops up and you nit  it, another pops up, then another, and another... Perhaps a classier way to describe it is the Greek myth of Sisyphus, the character who spent his day rolling a large boulder up a hill, only to have it roll back down and prompt another perpetual trek up the hill - again and again and all over again. In short, there's little time to sit back and reflect on whats happened and how you responded and learned from the issue.

This entry is an apologetic explanation of my intermittent blog posts, while reflecting on the issues that have limited my writing, and offering a perspective on a difference between the role of a principal and that of a superintendent.

Saturday, November 4, 2017

The Language of Leadership

There are a legion of books written on the subject of leadership. I have read more than my share of these texts. While I have cultivated much from these resources, my most simplistic view on principles underlying effective leadership begin with the manner in which we communicate. Specifically, the words we choose when speaking in any leadership role.

I believe that the appropriate point to start a discussion like this is the manner in which the formal leader of an organization refers to him/herself when speaking about the organization. Use of the personal "I" will not support an empowered work force and enlist them in pursuit of goals. Rather, when the formal leader employs the use of "we" or "our" in explaining the operation and aspirations of the organization.

Empowerment takes on heightened importance because it can increase commitment and outputs when people feel aligned with a greater purpose guiding an environment oriented to growing people as well as growing the success of the organization.

Money alone is not the incentive for people to invest fully in their work. It has been shown to not be a motivator, but rather a satisfier. The long term interests and needs of an organization rest on a compelling and credible vision, a meaningful mission, and most importantly a perception by the individual that they matter and make a difference within an organization that values and nurtures the opportunity to grow as a person.

Consider the advice of Bill O'Brien, a successful CEO who is quoted in Peter Senge's book, The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook:

Our traditional organizations are designed to provide for the first three levels of Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of human needs – food, shelter, and belonging. Since these are widely available to members of an industrial society, these organizations do not provide anything particularly unique to command the loyalty and commitment of people. The ferment in management today will continue until organizations begin to address the higher order needs: self-respect and self-actualization."